Iron Carbon Filler Inquiry Iron Carbon Filler Inquiry Iron Carbon Filler Inquiry Iron Carbon Filler Inquiry Iron Carbon Filler Inquiry -----Fe-Carbon Filler Non-Cut, Low Loss, No Replacement Li Min --Fe-Carbon Filler, Iron Carbon Filler (Puin Worun Environmental Protection)
You will get efficient and thoughtful service from NFJ.
Iron carbon filler features:
&#;&#; 1. Solved the problem of packing, passivation, activation, and replacement of fillers in the micro-electrolysis wastewater treatment process, and has the advantage of continuous high activity iron bed. The loss of conventional iron-carbon fillers is reduced by more than 60 %, while the amount of sludge produced by treatment is reduced by more than 50 %.
&#;&#; 2. The internal cathode and anode of the electrolyzer will form a structural alloy structure through high temperature. It will not separate cathodes and anodes like the iron-carbon hybrid assembly and will affect the galvanic reaction. The regular micro-electrolyte packing has long service life, convenient operation and maintenance, and only consumes a small amount of micro-electrolytic packing during the processing. According to the consumption volume, microelectrolysis needs only to be added on a regular basis without replacement.
&#;&#; 3 , the use of microporous activation technology, a large specific surface area, at the same time with the addition of catalysts, provide greater current density and better micro-electrolysis reaction effect of wastewater treatment, the reaction rate is fast.
&#;&#; 4 , due to the dual role of micro-electrolysis and catalysts, compared with the traditional iron-carbon fillers for the treatment of large concentrations of organic matter, high toxicity, high chroma, difficult to biochemical wastewater treatment, wastewater COD removal rate is generally about 35 % -60 %, color The removal rate of more than 95 % and the increase of B / C ratio can greatly increase the biodegradability of wastewater.
&#;&#; 5 , electrolytic treatment method can achieve the effect of chemical precipitation of phosphorus removal, but also through the reduction of heavy metals. After micro-electrolysis treatment, the waste water will form the original ferrous or iron ions in water. It has better coagulation than common coagulants. No additional coagulant such as iron salt is needed. The COD removal rate is high and will not be correct. Water causes secondary pollution.
&#;&#; 6 , Fe2 + catalysis, adding H2O2 after micro-electrolysis , that is, Fenton oxidation process, the desolvation rate of some hard-degradable chemical wastewater CODcr up to 75-95 %. It has a very good degradation effect on difficult-to-degrade bio-organic substances that contain even fluorine, carbon double bonds, nitro groups, and halogenated structures.
&#;&#; 7 , the technology through high-temperature sintering and other means of iron and metal catalysts and carbon contained together to form a structural iron-carbon structure. The integration of iron and carbon can avoid the formation of passivation. Although there is passivation of bare iron, the passivation layer can be reduced due to the friction between the particles, while the iron and carbon in the frame is not affected by passivation.
1. Gupta S, Srivastava P, Patil SA, Yadav AK. A comprehensive review on emerging constructed wetland coupled microbial fuel cell technology: Potential applications and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. ;320:. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..
2. Tansel B, Jolis D, Ho CFH. Gaseous emissions from wastewater facilities. Water. Environ. Res. ;76:&#;. https://doi.org/10./x
3. Faulwetter JL, Gagnon V, Sundberg C, et al. Microbial processes influencing performance of treatment wetlands: A review. Ecol Eng. ;35:987&#;. https://doi.org/10./j.ecoleng..12.030
4. Fang YK, Sun Q, Fang PH, et al. Integrated constructed wetland and bioelectrochemistry system approach for simultaneous enhancment of p-chloronitrobenzene and nitrogen transformations performance. Water. Res. ;217:. https://doi.org/10./j.watres..
5. Vymazal J. The use of hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment with special attention to nitrogen removal: A review of a recent development. Water. Res. ;47:&#;. https://doi.org/10./j.watres..05.029
6. Zhao M, Wang S, Wang HS, et al. Application of sodium titanate nanofibers as constructed wetland fillers for efficient removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Environ. Pollut. ;248:938&#;946. https://doi.org/10./j.envpol..02.040
7. Li D, Zheng B, Chu Z, Liu Y, Huang M. Seasonal variations of performance and operation in field-scale storing multipond constructed wetlands for nonpoint source pollution mitigation in a plateau lake basin. Bioresour. Technol. ;280:295&#;302. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..01.116
8. Vymazal J. The use constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow for various types of wastewater. Ecol. Eng. ;35:1&#;17. https://doi.org/10./j.ecoleng..08.016
9. Koutsou OP, Fountoulakis MS, Matsoukas C, Fyllas NM, Stasinakis AS. Estimation of N2O emissions from wastewater characteristics in constructed wetlands. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. ;9:. https://doi.org/10./j.jece..
10. Pan T, Zhu XD, Ye YP. Estimate of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatment plants: A case study in China. Ecol. Eng. ;37:248&#;254. https://doi.org/10./j.ecoleng..11.014
11. Wang F, Tang J, Ye S, Liu J. Blue Carbon Sink Function of Chinese Coastal Wetlands and Carbon Neutrality Strategy. Bull Chinese. Aca. Sci. ;36:241&#;251. https://doi.org/10./j.issn.-.
12. Janssen MA, Walker KF. Processing of riparian and wetland plant litter in the River Murray, South Australia. Hydrobiologia. ;411:53&#;64. https://doi.org/10./a:
4 +), nitrate (NO3 &#;), and phosphate (PO4 3&#;). Chemosphere. ;119:646&#;653.13. Wang Z, Guo H, Shen F, et al. Biochar produced from oak sawdust by Lanthanum (La)-involved pyrolysis for adsorption of ammonium (NH), nitrate (NO), and phosphate (PO). Chemosphere. ;119:646&#;653. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..07.084
14. Cui X, Wang J, Wang X, et al. Biochar from constructed wetland biomass waste: A review of its potential and challenges. Chemosphere. ;287:. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..
15. Zhou X, Liang CL, Jia LX, Feng LK, Wang RG, Wu HM. An innovative biochar-amended substrate vertical flow constructed wetland for low C/N wastewater treatment: Impact of influent strengths. Bioresour. Technol. ;247:844&#;850. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..09.044
16. Smith P. Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. Global. Change. Biol. ;22:&#;. https://doi.org/10./gcb.
17. Sheng YQ, Zhan Y, Zhu LZ. Reduced carbon sequestration potential of biochar in acidic soil. Sci. Total. Environ. ;572:129&#;137. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..07.140
18. Zhang SP, Wang L, Wei W, et al. Enhanced roles of biochar and organic fertilizer in microalgae for soil carbon sink. Biodegradation. ;29:313&#;321. https://doi.org/10./s-017--0
19. Chen X, Zhu H, Yan B, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and wastewater treatment performance by three plant species in subsurface flow constructed wetland mesocosms. Chemosphere. ;239:. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..
20. Di XC, Wang Y, Fu YQ, Wu XM, Wang P. Wheat flour-derived nanoporous carbon@ZnFe2O4 hierarchical composite as an outstanding microwave absorber. Carbon. ;173:174&#;184. https://doi.org/10./j.carbon..11.006
21. Nirmaladevi S, Boopathiraja R, Kandasamy SK, Sathishkumar S, Parthibavarman M. Wood based biochar supported MnO2 nanorods for high energy asymmetric supercapacitor applications. Surf. Interfaces. ;27:27. https://doi.org/10./j.surfin..
22. Li YX, Shang HR, Cao YN, Yang CH, Feng YJ, Yu YL. High performance removal of sulfamethoxazole using large specific area of biochar derived from corncob xylose residue. Biochar. ;4:004. https://doi.org/10./s-021--9
23. Palansooriya KN, Wong JTF, Hashimoto Y, et al. Response of microbial communities to biochar-amended soils: a critical review. Biochar. ;1:3&#;22. https://doi.org/10./s-019--2
24. Rajan RJ, Sudarsan JS, Nithiyanantham S. Microbial population dynamics in constructed wetlands: Review of recent advancements for wastewater treatment. Environ. Eng. Res. ;24:181&#;190. https://doi.org/10./eer..127
25. Harvey OR, Kuo L-J, Zimmerman AR, Louchouarn P, Amonette JE, Herbert BE. An Index-Based Approach to Assessing Recalcitrance and Soil Carbon Sequestration Potential of Engineered Black Carbons (Biochars). Environ. Sci. Technol. ;46:&#;. https://doi.org/10./es
26. Nair RR, Mondal MM, Weichgrebe D. Biochar from co-pyrolysis of urban organic wastes-investigation of carbon sink potential using ATR-FTIR and TGA. Biomass. Convers. Biorefin. ;12:&#;. https://doi.org/10./s-020--9
28. Cui X, Hao H, He Z, Stoffella PJ, Yang X. Pyrolysis of wetland biomass waste: Potential for carbon sequestration and water remediation. J. Environ. Manage. ;173:95&#;104. https://doi.org/10./j.jenvman..02.049
29. Jazinaninejad M, Nematollahi M, Zamenjani AS, Tajbakhsh A. Sustainable operations, managerial decisions, and quantitative analytics of biomass supply chains: A systematic literature review. J. Cleaner Prod. ;374:. https://doi.org/10./j.jclepro..
30. Xiong J, Liang L, Shi W, et al. Application of biochar in modification of fillers in bioretention cells: A review. Ecol. Eng. ;181:. https://doi.org/10./j.ecoleng..
31. Tomczyk A, Sokolowska Z, Boguta P. Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio. ;19:191&#;215. https://doi.org/10./s-020--3
32. Guo X, Cui X, Li H. Effects of fillers combined with biosorbents on nutrient and heavy metal removal from biogas slurry in constructed wetlands. Sci. Total. Environ. ;703:. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..
33. Xu CL, Feng YL, Li HR, Yang Y, Wu RF. Research progress of phosphorus adsorption by attapulgite and its prospect as a filler of constructed wetlands to enhance phosphorus removal from mariculture wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. ;10:. https://doi.org/10./j.jece..
34. Gupta P, Ann T-w, Lee S-M. Use of biochar to enhance constructed wetland performance in wastewater reclamation. Environ. Eng. Res. ;21:36&#;44. https://doi.org/10./eer..067
35. de Rozari P, Greenway M, El Hanandeh A. Nitrogen removal from sewage and septage in constructed wetland mesocosms using sand media amended with biochar. Ecol. Eng. ;111:1&#;10. https://doi.org/10./j.ecoleng..11.002
36. Cheng R, Hou S, Wang J, Zhu H, Shutes B, Yan B. Biochar-amended constructed wetlands for eutrophication control and microcystin (MC-LR) removal. Chemosphere. ;295:. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..
37. Verhamme DT, Prosser JI, Nicol GW. Ammonia concentration determines differential growth of ammonia-oxidising archaea and bacteria in soil microcosms. Isme. J. ;5:&#;. https://doi.org/10./ismej..191
38. Zhou X, Wang X, Zhang H, Wu H. Enhanced nitrogen removal of low C/N domestic wastewater using a biochar-amended aerated vertical flow constructed wetland. Bioresour. Technol. ;241:269&#;275. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..05.072
39. Du L, Zhao Y, Wang C, et al. Removal performance of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in swine wastewater by integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands with zeolite substrate. Sci. Total. Environ. ;721:. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..
40. Li JH, Lv GH, Bai WB, Liu Q, Zhang YC, Song JQ. Modification and use of biochar from wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) for nitrate and phosphate removal from water. Desalin. Water Treat. ;57:&#;. https://doi.org/10./..
41. Abedi T, Mojiri A. Constructed wetland modified by biochar/zeolite addition for enhanced wastewater treatment. Environ. Technol. Innov. ;16:. https://doi.org/10./j.eti..
42. Li J, Fan JL, Zhang J, Hu Z, Liang S. Preparation and evaluation of wetland plant-based biochar for nitrogen removal enhancement in surface flow constructed wetlands. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. ;25:&#;. https://doi.org/10./s-018--y
43. Zimmerman AR, Ouyang L. Priming of pyrogenic C (biochar) mineralization by dissolved organic matter and vice versa. Soil Biol. Biochem. ;130:105&#;112. https://doi.org/10./j.soilbio..12.011
44. Wu HM, Dong XY, Liu H. Evaluating fluorescent dissolved organic matter released from wetland-plant derived biochar: Effects of extracting solutions. Chemosphere. ;212:638&#;644. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..08.110
45. Kasak K, Truu J, Ostonen I, et al. Biochar enhances plant growth and nutrient removal in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Sci. Total. Environ. ;639:67&#;74. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..05.146
46. Lan W, Zhang J, Hu Z, et al. Phosphorus removal enhancement of magnesium modified constructed wetland microcosm and its mechanism study. Chem. Eng. J. ;335:209&#;214. https://doi.org/10./j.cej..10.150
47. Liu Y, Feng L, Liu Y, Zhang L. A novel constructed wetland based on iron carbon substrates: performance optimization and mechanisms of simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. ;30:&#;. https://doi.org/10./s-022--7
48. Chand N, Kumar K, Suthar S. &#;Cattle dung biochar-packed vertical flow constructed wetland for nutrient removal&#;: Effect of intermittent aeration and wastewater COD/N loads on the removal process. J. Water. Process. Eng. ;43:. https://doi.org/10./j.jwpe..
49. Guo XF, Cui XY, Li HS, Xiong BH. Purifying effect of biochar-zeolite constructed wetlands on arsenic-containing biogas slurry in large-scale pig farms. J. Cleaner Prod. ;279:. https://doi.org/10./j.jclepro..
For more China Iron-carbon filler for pollutant removalinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.
50. Zhou X, Wang RG, Liu H, Wu SB, Wu HM. Nitrogen removal responses to biochar addition in intermittent-aerated subsurface flow constructed wetland microcosms: Enhancing role and mechanism. Ecol. Eng. ;128:57&#;65. https://doi.org/10./j.ecoleng..12.028
51. de Rozari P, Greenway M, El Hanandeh A. Phosphorus removal from secondary sewage and septage using sand media amended with biochar in constructed wetland mesocosms. Sci. Total Environ. ;569:123&#;133. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..06.096
52. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, et al. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere. ;99:19&#;33. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..10.071
53. Chang J, Peng D, Deng S, Chen J, Duan C. Efficient treatment of mercury(II)-containing wastewater in aerated constructed wetland microcosms packed with biochar. Chemosphere. ;290:. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..
54. Uchimiya M, Wartelle LH, Lima IM, Klasson KT. Sorption of Deisopropylatrazine on Broiler Litter Biochars. J. Agri. Food Chem. ;58:&#;. https://doi.org/10./jfq
55. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Dou X, et al. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresour. Technol. ;118:536&#;544. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..05.042
56. Sun K, Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Pan Z, Xing B. Sorption of fluorinated herbicides to plant biomass-derived biochars as a function of molecular structure. Bioresour. Technol. ;102:&#;. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..08.036
57. Tang X, Yang Y, Tao R, et al. Fate of mixed pesticides in an integrated recirculating constructed wetland (IRCW). Sci Total. Environ. ;571:935&#;942. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..07.079
58. Deng SJ, Chen JQ, Chang JN. Application of biochar as an innovative substrate in constructed wetlands/biofilters for wastewater treatment: Performance and ecological benefits. J. Cleaner Prod. ;293:. https://doi.org/10./j.jclepro..
59. Mittal Y, Srivastava P, Kumar N, et al. Ultra-fast and low-cost electroactive biochar production for electroactive-constructed wetland applications: A circular concept for plant biomass utilization. Chem. Eng. J. ;452:. https://doi.org/10./j.cej..
60. Zhang YF, Wang JM, Feng Y. The effects of biochar addition on soil physicochemical properties: A review. Catena. ;202:. https://doi.org/10./j.catena..
61. Schievano A, Sciarria TP, Gao YC, et al. Dark fermentation, anaerobic digestion and microbial fuel cells: An integrated system to valorize swine manure and rice bran. Waste. Manage. ;56:519&#;529. https://doi.org/10./j.wasman..07.001
62. Zheng RL, Cai C, Liang JH, et al. The effects of biochars from rice residue on the formation of iron plaque and the accumulation of Cd, Zn, Pb, As in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere. ;89:856&#;862. https://doi.org/10./j.chemosphere..05.008
63. Chakraborty I, Sathe SM, Dubey BK, Ghangrekar MM. Waste-derived biochar: Applications and future perspective in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. ;312:. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..
64. Kizito S, Lv T, Wu S, Ajmal Z, Luo H, Dong R. Treatment of anaerobic digested effluent in biochar-packed vertical flow constructed wetland columns: Role of media and tidal operation. Sci. Total. Environ. ;592:197&#;205. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..03.125
65. Deng C, Huang L, Liang Y, et al. Response of microbes to biochar strengthen nitrogen removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Microbial community structure and metabolite characteristics. Sci. Total. Environ. ;694:. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..
66. DeLuca TH, MacKenzie MD, Gundale MJ, Holben WE. Wildfire-produced charcoal directly influences nitrogen cycling in ponderosa pine forests. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. ;70:448&#;453. https://doi.org/10./sssaj.
67. Song Y, Zhang X, Ma B, Chang SX, Gong J. Biochar addition affected the dynamics of ammonia oxidizers and nitrification in microcosms of a coastal alkaline soil. Biol. Fert. Soils. ;50:321&#;332. https://doi.org/10./s-013--8
68. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. Biochar effects on soil biota - A review. Soil. Boil Biochem. ;43:&#;. https://doi.org/10./j.soilbio..04.022
69. Liu YS, Feng L, Liu YZ, Zhang LQ. A novel constructed wetland based on iron carbon substrates: performance optimization and mechanisms of simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. ;30:&#;. https://doi.org/10./s-022--7
70. He K, He G, Wang C, et al. Biochar amendment ameliorates soil properties and promotes Miscanthus growth in a coastal saline-alkali soil. Appl. Soil. Ecol. ;155:. https://doi.org/10./j.apsoil..
71. Du ZL, Zhao JK, Wang YD, Zhang QZ. Biochar addition drives soil aggregation and carbon sequestration in aggregate fractions from an intensive agricultural system. J. Soils. Sediments. ;17:581&#;589. https://doi.org/10./s-015--2
72. Li J, Fan J, Liu D, Hu Z, Zhang J. Enhanced nitrogen removal in biochar-added surface flow constructed wetlands: dealing with seasonal variation in the north China. Environ. SoiI. Pollut. ;26:&#;. https://doi.org/10./s-018--9
73. Werner S, Kaetzl K, Wichern M, Buerkert A, Steiner C, Marschner B. Agronomic benefits of biochar as a soil amendment after its use as waste water filtration medium. Environ Pollut. ;233:561&#;568. https://doi.org/10./j.envpol..10.048
74. Aguirre-Villegas HA, Benson CH. Expectations for Coal Demand in Response to Evolving Carbon Policy and Climate Change Awareness. Energies. ;15:. https://doi.org/10./en
75. Araujo OQF, Gobbi CN, Chaloub RM, Coelho MAZ. Assessment of the Impact of Salinity and Irradiance on the Combined Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Carotenoids Production by Dunaliella salina: A Mathematical Model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. ;102:425&#;435. https://doi.org/10./bit.
76. Kong SH, Loh SK, Bachmann RT, Zainal H, Cheong KV. PALM KERNEL SHELL BIOCHAR PRODUCTION, CHARACTERISTICS AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL. J. Oil. Palm Res. ;31:508&#;520. https://doi.org/10./jopr..
77. Du Z-L, Zhao J-K, Wang Y-D, Zhang Q-Z. Biochar addition drives soil aggregation and carbon sequestration in aggregate fractions from an intensive agricultural system. J. Soil Sediment. ;17:581&#;589. https://doi.org/10./s-015--2
78. Guo J, Chen B. Insights on the Molecular Mechanism for the Recalcitrance of Biochars: Interactive Effects of Carbon and Silicon Components. Environ. Sci. Technol. ;48:&#;. https://doi.org/10./ese
79. Zimmerman AR. Abiotic and Microbial Oxidation of Laboratory-Produced Black Carbon (Biochar). Environ. Sci Technol. ;44:&#;. https://doi.org/10./esc
80. Windeatt JH, Ross AB, Williams PT, Forster PM, Nahil MA, Singh S. Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. J Environ. Manage. ;146:189&#;197. https://doi.org/10./j.jenvman..08.003
81. Tsai WT. Carbon-Negative Policies by Reusing Waste Wood as Material and Energy Resources for Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Taiwan. Atmosphere. ;12:. https://doi.org/10./atmos
82. Ganguly A, Brown RC, Wright MM. Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emission assessment of carbon negative pyrolysis technology. Green. Chem. ;24:&#;. https://doi.org/10./d2gch
83. Bruun S, Clauson-Kaas S, Bobulska L, Thomsen IK. Carbon dioxide emissions from biochar in soil: role of clay, microorganisms and carbonates. Eur. J. Soil. Sci. ;65:52&#;59. https://doi.org/10./ejss.
84. Liang B, Lehmann J, Sohi SP, et al. Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil. Org. Gochem. ;41:206&#;213. https://doi.org/10./j.orggeochem..09.007
85. Maltais-Landry G, Maranger R, Brisson J, Chazarenc F. Greenhouse gas production and efficiency of planted and artificially aerated constructed wetlands. Environ. Pollut. ;157:748&#;754. https://doi.org/10./j.envpol..11.019
86. Luan J, Cui L, Song H, Wang Y. Foreign Research Progress on Carbon Cycle in Wetland Ecosystems. Wetland. Sci. ;10:235&#;242. https://doi.org/-()02-235-08
87. Weiqing M, Zhanlei WU, Zhongliang W. Control factors and critical conditions between carbon sinking and sourcing of wetland ecosystem. Ecol. Environ. Sci. ;20:&#;. https://doi.org/10./S-(11)-1
88. Kayranli B, Scholz M, Mustafa A, Hedmark A. Carbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review. Wetlands. ;30:111&#;124. https://doi.org/10./s-009--4
89. Pattanayak A, Kumar KSK. Accounting for impacts due to climate change in GHG mitigation burden sharing. Clim. Policy. ;15:724&#;742. https://doi.org/10./..
90. Maucieri C, Barbera AC, Vymazal J, Borin M. A review on the main affecting factors of greenhouse gases emission in constructed wetlands. Agric. For. Meteorol. ;236:175&#;193. https://doi.org/10./j.agrformet..01.006
91. Ji B, Chen J, Mei J, et al. Roles of biochar media and oxygen supply strategies in treatment performance, greenhouse gas emissions, and bacterial community features of subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour. Technol. ;302:. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..
92. Tai PD, Li PJ, Sun TH, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from a constructed wetland for municipal sewage treatment. J Environ. Sci. ;14:27&#;33. https://doi.org/10./j.issn:-..01.005
93. Zhou X, Jia L, Liang C, Feng L, Wang R, Wu H. Simultaneous enhancement of nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide reduction by a saturated biochar-based intermittent aeration vertical flow constructed wetland: Effects of influent strength. Chem. Eng J. ;334:&#;. https://doi.org/10./j.cej..11.066
94. Angst TE, Patterson CJ, Reay DS, Anderson P, Peshkur TA, Sohi SP. Biochar Diminishes Nitrous Oxide and Nitrate Leaching from Diverse Nutrient Sources. J. Environ. Qual. ;42:672&#;682. https://doi.org/10./jeq.
95. Wang F, Harindintwali JD, Yuan ZZ, et al. Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. Innovation. ;2:. https://doi.org/10./j.xinn..
96. El-Mahrouky M, El-Naggar AH, Usman AR, Al-Wabel M. Dynamics of CO2 Emission and Biochemical Properties of a Sandy Calcareous Soil Amended with Conocarpus Waste and Biochar. Pedosphere. ;25:46&#;56. https://doi.org/10./s-(14)-8
97. Guo F, Zhang J, Yang X, He Q, Ao L, Chen Y. Impact of biochar on greenhouse gas emissions from constructed wetlands under various influent chemical oxygen demand to nitrogen ratios. Bioresour. Technol. ;303:. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..
98. Sun Y, Qi S, Zheng F, et al. Organics removal, nitrogen removal and N2O emission in subsurface wastewater infiltration systems amended with/without biochar and sludge. Bioresour Technol. ;249:57&#;61. https://doi.org/10./j.biortech..10.004
99. Spokas KA, Novak JM, Venterea RT. Biochar&#;s role as an alternative N-fertilizer: ammonia capture. Plant. Soil. ;350:35&#;42. https://doi.org/10./s-011--8
100. Yanai Y, Toyota K, Okazaki M. Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. ;53:181&#;188. https://doi.org/10./j.-...x
101. Liu X, Mao P, Li L, Ma J. Impact of biochar application on yield-scaled greenhouse gas intensity: A meta-analysis. Sci Total. Environ. ;656:969&#;976. https://doi.org/10./j.scitotenv..11.396
102. Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A. Influence of Biochars on Nitrous Oxide Emission and Nitrogen Leaching from Two Contrasting Soils. J. Environ. Qual. ;39:&#;. https://doi.org/10./jeq.
103. Cornelissen G, Rutherford DW, Arp HPH, Dorsch P, Kelly CN, Rostad CE. Sorption of Pure N2O to Biochars and Other Organic and Inorganic Materials under Anhydrous Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. ;47:&#;. https://doi.org/10./esq
104. Hu S, Zhu H, Bañuelos G, et al. Factors Influencing Gaseous Emissions in Constructed Wetlands: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. ;20:. https://doi.org/10./ijerph
105. Yuan HY, Ding LJ, Zama EF, Liu PP, Hozzein WN, Zhu YG. Biochar Modulates Methanogenesis through Electron Syntrophy of Microorganisms with Ethanol as a Substrate. Environ. Sci. Technol. ;52:&#;. https://doi.org/10./acs.est.8b
106. Chen X, Zhu H, Banuelos G, Shutes B, Yan BX, Cheng R. Biochar reduces nitrous oxide but increases methane emissions in batch wetland mesocosms. Chem. Eng. J. ;392:. https://doi.org/10./j.cej..
Want more information on China Dust suppression for material handling? Feel free to contact us.